ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the prevalence of nosocomial infection among inpatients in a tertiary hospital， and provide scientific evidence for hospital infection control and targeted surveillance. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate a total of 543 hospitalized patients using the hospital information system. Results The prevalence of hospital-acquired infection （HAI） was 4.24%， and that of community-acquired infection （CAI） was 23.39%. HAI prevalence differed significantly among the departments （ χ 2=148.870， P <0.05）， and was highest in the department of intensive care medicine （72.73%）. Sites of infection were significantly different between HAI and CAI （ χ 2=22.942， P =0.011）； however， the most frequent site of infection was lower respiratory tract in both HAI and CAI. Major pathogens for nosocomial infection were Gram-negative bacteria （56.92%）， mainly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae . Antimicrobial usage was observed in 31.68% of the patients， principally for therapeutic use of antibacterial drugs （80.23%） and a combination of drugs （88.95%）. Examination rate of pathogens following the antimicrobial usage was 72.08%. Conclusion The investigation on the prevalence of nosocomial infection may facilitate fully understanding the nosocomial infection. It warrants strengthening the monitoring in the departments of intensive care medicine and on multi-resistant bacteria， and achieving antimicrobial stewardship， so as to improve the awareness of hospital infection control in medical staff' and effectively reduce the occurrence of nosocomial infection.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the prevalence of nosocomial infection among inpatients in a tertiary hospital， and provide scientific evidence for hospital infection control and targeted surveillance. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate a total of 543 hospitalized patients using the hospital information system. Results The prevalence of hospital-acquired infection （HAI） was 4.24%， and that of community-acquired infection （CAI） was 23.39%. HAI prevalence differed significantly among the departments （ χ 2=148.870， P <0.05）， and was highest in the department of intensive care medicine （72.73%）. Sites of infection were significantly different between HAI and CAI （ χ 2=22.942， P =0.011）； however， the most frequent site of infection was lower respiratory tract in both HAI and CAI. Major pathogens for nosocomial infection were Gram-negative bacteria （56.92%）， mainly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae . Antimicrobial usage was observed in 31.68% of the patients， principally for therapeutic use of antibacterial drugs （80.23%） and a combination of drugs （88.95%）. Examination rate of pathogens following the antimicrobial usage was 72.08%. Conclusion The investigation on the prevalence of nosocomial infection may facilitate fully understanding the nosocomial infection. It warrants strengthening the monitoring in the departments of intensive care medicine and on multi-resistant bacteria， and achieving antimicrobial stewardship， so as to improve the awareness of hospital infection control in medical staff' and effectively reduce the occurrence of nosocomial infection.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo observe the status of social supports of the patients with advanced cancer and probe the effective nursing measures to improve the social supports of the patients.Methods"Social support rating scale"of Xiao Shui-yuan was applied to investigate the social support state of a total of 58 advanced cancer patients and 63 patients with chronic diseases.ResultsThe total score of patients with advanced cancer was(32.86±6.86),of patients with chronic diseases was(41.83±7.88).Compared with chronic disease group,the patients with advanced cancer received less social supports(P<0.05).The marriage state and economic income were significant factors to influence social support.ConclusionsThe patients with advanced cancer received less social supports than patients with chronic disease.Nursing staff should evaluate the status of social supports correctly,provide health education on patients and members in the net of social supports,make use of relative resources,then improve the social support level of the patients.